Irredeemable – A Review of Anurag Kashyap’s Paanch


This Post Contains Spoilers.

After Logik’s comment on my previous post, I decided to watch Paanch. It was one of those movies I’ve always wanted to watch, but not finding a copy online in the past put the idea out of my head. I didn’t want to watch it because I expected it to be awesomeness personified; it was more of curiosity – it wasn’t allowed to be released, and recently, I’d watched Anurag Kashyap’s movie for Star Bestsellers – Last Train to Mahakali, which starred Kay Kay Menon, and was rather impressed.

The movie starts off as expected – trippy opening credits – chaotic visuals of Mumbai(?) streets from a vehicle, as shot from a moving vehicle. And then the whole dope and rock n’ roll bit.

The story moves slowly. Until the Kidnapping.

There are five main characters, as the title suggests. It’s mainly told from the point of view of Murgi (Aditya Srivastava), who doesn’t have much to do in the movie until the end. The screen is occupied more by the cowardly Pondy, and the explosive, Satanic, edgy, pure evil Luke (which, midway through the movie, I wonder if it’s a shortened version of Lucifer. One of Kay Kay Menon’s best performances, I’ll say.), and the extremely loyal Joy. And in the second half, by the street-smart money-minded promiscuous Shiuli (Tejaswini Kolhapure).

Nothing redeeming about any of them. They are portrayed as being all about vices, no single endearing characteristic about any of them. No backstories that justify their behaviour. In another movie, you would have Shiuli’s promiscuity being explained by showing a flashback of her parents’ divorce, or being abused, or some such. But not here. The characters are unapologetically what they are.

Long story short, they have a band. And they need money for a demo tape. One of their friends suggests they ‘kidnap’ him and ask his father for ransom. And in one of his many fits of rage, Luke beats him to death. The police get suspicious. Luke gets edgier. Pondy gets cowardlier. They decide to rob the friend’s father. He walks in on them cleaning out his money. They kill him. His policeman pal finds out and confronts them. He is killed too, as is the constable with him. Soon, all four of them get frustrated with everything. They drown Luke. They turn themselves in.

So far, so good. If not sympathize or identify with the characters, you grok them, their motivations, their every next move. They are not deep, or with multiple layers, but that’s the whole point. The movie seems so far like a delicious study of anger, of frustration, of inflicting psychological pain, of forgetting all about right and wrong, of forgetting all about consequences. It is delectably trippy. It doesn’t tell a story so far; it presents to you a collection of fascinating characters together, like a social experiment or something – some points almost bring to mind the Stanford Prison Experiment.  Nothing is explicitly said – it’s there for you to see, in the graffiti, in the way they speak, in their body language, in the bloodied dolls with severed heads in Luke’s room.

And at this point, Anurag Kashyap slips. Trips. And makes this your regular movie.

Spoiler Alert
So it turns out Luke is not dead, and it was all a plan hatched by Murgi (yes, pun intended, you can laugh), Luke and Shiuli. And then the cunning woman pits them against each other, and everyone ends up dead and she decamps with the cash, becomes a popstar.
End Spoiler.

That killed it for me. That really did. The meandering first three-quarters of the movie prepared me for an ending, where, possibly, everyone dies, or where some die and the rest live on…. but not one where people take advantage of each other. If that was to be the highlight, it could have been done in so many other colourful, entertaining, psychedelic ways, keeping with the rest of the movie. There could have been such an undercurrent throughout the movie, if not through Shiuli, through some other character. You begin to feel the last quarter of the movie was ghost-directed by the spotboy or something.

And why was this banned? Because it showed the bad guy coming out smelling of roses? Flimsy. I think Dhoom probably had more sex and violence than this flick.

My verdict: It has its moments. Good dialogues [There’s this one bit where Murgi and Pondy try their hand at waiting tables, and there’s this frustrating customer who gives a long list of specs about his omelette. To which Murgi says “Murgi ka naam Champa hai, chalega?”] , great acting [As a friend said, Kay Kay has enough in him to have Mogambo running scared]. And the music, one of Vishal Bharadwaj’s best. All the songs are good to listen to, especially the jazzish Kaisa Hai Sheher by Dominique.  Along with the visuals, it all comes together to make a trippy watch.  A lot of promise, sadly shattered by the incongruent dénouement. Recommended watch. Out of Paanch, I’ll give it Teen. But only because I don’t give full ratings to any movie, and hence everything is suitably downgraded.

PS: The only version of Paanch that is out is a pirated version of the preview copy. Don’t feel too bad about watching that… Anurag Kashyap himself doesn’t much mind. Check out this byte from him: here.

dénouement

About wanderlust

just your average books-and-music person who wants to change the world.
This entry was posted in movies, Review and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Irredeemable – A Review of Anurag Kashyap’s Paanch

  1. Siri says:

    According to that old filler on MTV, Chito Chat or some such, nobody recognised Kay Kay when he turned up with his new look on set because before the makeover, he looked like a paavam southie boy with glasses and greasy hair.

    Woman. Put a spoiler alert!!!!

  2. Logik says:

    Oh good, I’ve created a movie reviewer engine…[ Shall I pass along some more recos? 🙂 ]

    Anurag Kashyap excels in bringing out the most pathetic virtues out of a character, squeezing him through all possible misdemeanours as permitted by common sense, and then some more.

    This is precisely the reason why I hold DevD in high regard. Never again will the character of Devdas be made to endure so much infamy, and commit the series of vices that Abhay Deol is subjected to. [ which also puts an end to the Devdas series, yay ]

    He fails in the end, yes. But I presume giving a ‘twist’ was his only chance at commercializing this venture. It’d take the guts the likes of the makers of ‘Ek Duje Ke liye’ probably for an all-out ending. Still, pretty dark enough considering his limitations.

    Speaking of interesting characters, his Gulaal is also worth a watch. A bit too long, but you’ll love the references that he makes throughout the movie. Popculture, global politics, Classic Rock etc. [ even seen in Paanch – The Doors, Hippie lifestyle ]

    • wanderlust says:

      recos two weeks later. i’ll be dying for movies then. planning on a miyazaki fest.
      Agree with everything you said. I watched part of Gulaal (that was months ago! haven’t gotten around to finishing it yet! what’s with me?), and i think that was a rather well-crafted movie, with the references, with the gritty storyline and dialogues.

  3. Ravi says:

    Censor Board denied it even a A certificate allegedly because it has dialogues which refer to mythological characters(must be Draupadi/Sita) and the same dialogues contain cuss words.

    Censor Board used to be headed by a gentleman who played the role of Ravana in Ramanand Sagar’s Ramayana and was a NDA/BJP appointee.

    Politicians playing against creative work has always been there, even the past chairman of censor board, Ms Sharmila Tagore, who’s otherwise considered a liberal, had different yardsticks for movies made by Congress friendly filmmakers and non-Congress filmmakers.

    • wanderlust says:

      was that all? i remember anurag kashyap in one of his early interviews whining that the censors had a problem with the violence whereas the only violent scene where they beat that guy to death didn’t show the actual beating-to-death.

  4. Rohit says:

    I did not read the above write-up completely as it seems like story of Paanch is what is written above. But if you want to know what Paanch as a movie has to offer, pls click the following link:

    http://rohitiswrite.weebly.com/paanch–1998.html

  5. Akshay says:

    This movie was dark as hell..till the director decided to make it a suspense thriller… It has a huge plothole..where the two guys…the fat one and scared one are imprisoned for the crime they didn’t even commit. They fat guy knew Luke wasn’t dead.still he accepts being charged as guilty. Non sense. What stood above all inthefilm was kk menons performance

  6. But any addictive behavior changes you, and your lady might not
    put up with your changes. Blind trust is the belief that love means your
    partner is always one with you and would never hurt you.
    That is because it is simply too overwhelming and
    you will need treatment just like most addictions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s